Déjà vu in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Déjà vu (DV), a French term meaning "already seen," refers to inappropriate sensation of familiarity in the present moment, as if it had been experienced before without a specific recollection of when or where. Traditionally, DV has been closely associated with focal seizures originating from the medial temporal lobe. However, there are occasional reports of DV occurring in idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs). The objective of our study was to assess the presence and frequency of DV in individuals with IGE. METHODS: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for protocols (PRISMA-P) and searched PubMed and Embase from January 2000 to July 2022. RESULTS: 5 studies were included with a total of 1177 IGE and 1026 with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients. The frequency of DV in IGE ranged from 0 to 11 %, and the average was 3 %, compared to 19.6 % in TLE. Broadly, 40 % of patients with IGE reported some type of aura. EEG correlation of DV in IGE was not appropriately evaluated in the studies. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that individuals with IGE may experience DV and other types of auras. Recognizing these auras is crucial in order to avoid misdiagnosing IGE as focal epilepsy. This is important to prevent unnecessary investigations and incorrect treatment decisions.

Practices in the prescription of antiseizure medications: is it time to change?

The treatment of epilepsy has advanced over the past 30 years through the development of new antiseizure medications (ASMs). Unfortunately, not all of them have been approved yet in Brazil, and many are still underused. When comparing new ASMs to older ones, they are generally not more effective in treating epilepsy. However, they offer better tolerability, with fewer interactions and long-term side effects, especially for patients with comorbidities or those requiring polytherapy. Enzyme induction caused by older ASMs is associated with increased cholesterol levels, drug interactions with decreased effects of statins and other cardiovascular medications, anticoagulants, chemotherapy, immunosuppressors, anti-infective agents (including HIV treatment), antidepressants, and contraceptives. Additionally, they can reduce levels of vitamin D and sex hormones, as well as decrease bone density. The increasing concern about these effects during life, especially after prolonged exposure, has led most developed countries to change prescription patterns in favor of new ASMs, particularly levetiracetam and lamotrigine. Both are also considered the safest options for women of childbearing age. Regrettably, the prescription trends in Brazil have remained largely unchanged over time. This can be partially attributed to the slower approval process of ASM and the reluctance of general physicians and neurologists to embrace these new concepts. In this concise review, we highlight the various advantages linked to the new ASM, aiming to promote a shift in the prescription pattern for ASM. The selection of ASM should be customized according to individual characteristics, and practical suggestions for choosing ASMs are provided in this paper.

O tratamento da epilepsia avançou nos últimos 30 anos com o desenvolvimento de novos medicamentos anticrise (MAC). Infelizmente, nem todos estão aprovados no Brasil e muitos ainda são subutilizados. Os novos MAC não são mais eficazes que os antigos, mas apresentam melhor tolerabilidade, menos interações e efeitos colaterais a longo prazo, especialmente para pacientes com comorbidades ou que necessitam de politerapia. A indução enzimática causada pelos MAC antigos está associada ao aumento dos níveis de colesterol, interações medicamentosas com redução do efeito das estatinas e outros medicamentos cardiovasculares, anticoagulantes, quimioterapia, imunossupressores, agentes anti-infecciosos (incluindo tratamento do HIV), antidepressivos e contraceptivos. Além disso, podem reduzir os níveis de vitamina D e hormônios sexuais, podendo afetar a massa óssea. A crescente preocupação sobre estes efeitos ao longo da vida, com a exposição prolongada, levou a maioria dos países desenvolvidos a modificar o padrão de prescrição com maior uso dos novos MAC, especialmente levetiracetam e lamotrigina. Ambos são considerados as opções mais seguras para mulheres em idade fértil. Infelizmente, as tendências de prescrição no Brasil permaneceram praticamente inalteradas ao longo do tempo. Isto pode ser parcialmente explicado pela lentidão no processo de aprovação dos MAC e à resistência dos médicos generalistas e neurologistas em adotar estes novos conceitos. Nesta revisão, destacamos as vantagens dos novos MAC e a necessidade da mudança no padrão de prescrição também no Brasil. A escolha do MAC deve ser feita de acordo com as características individuais dos pacientes e sugestões práticas são apresentadas.

Predictive factors for successful vagus nerve stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy: real-life insights from a multicenter study.

Introduction: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy is an established treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy that reduces seizure frequency by at least 50% in approximately half of patients; however, the characteristics of the patients with the best response have not yet been identified. Thus, it is important to identify the profile of patients who would have the best response to guide early indications and better patient selection. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as an adjuvant therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy from six epilepsy centers in Brazil. Data from 192 patients aged 2-66 years were analyzed, and all patients received at least 6 months of therapy to be included. Results: Included patients were aged 2-66 years (25.6 ± 14.3), 105 (54.7%) males and 87 (45.8%) females. Median follow-up interval was 5 years (range, 2005-2018). Overall, the response rate (≥50% seizure reduction) after VNS implantation was 65.6% (126/192 patients). Most patients had 50-90% seizure reduction (60.9%) and nine patients became seizure-free. There were no serious complications associated with VNS implantation. The rate of a ≥ 50% seizure reduction response was significantly higher in patients with no history of neurosurgery. The presence of focal without generalized seizures and focal discharges on interictal EEG was associated with better response. Overall, etiological predictors of a better VNS response profile were tumors while a worse response to VNS was related to the presence of vascular malformations and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. Discussion: We observed an association between a better response to VNS therapy no history of neurosurgery, focal interictal epileptiform activity, and focal seizure pattern. Additionally, it is important to highlight that age was not a determinant factor of the response, as children and adults had similar response rates. Thus, VNS therapy should be considered in both adults and children with DRE.

Status epilepticus: review on diagnosis, monitoring and treatment.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. According to the new ILAE 2015 definition, SE results either from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or initiation, leading to abnormally prolonged seizures. The definition has different time points for convulsive, focal and absence SE. Time is brain. There are changes in synaptic receptors leading to a more proconvulsant state and increased risk of brain lesion and sequelae with long duration. Management of SE must include three pillars: stop seizures, stabilize patients to avoid secondary lesions and treat underlying causes. Convulsive SE is defined after 5 minutes and is a major emergency. Benzodiazepines are the initial treatment, and should be given fast and an adequate dose. Phenytoin/fosphenytoin, levetiracetam and valproic acid are evidence choices for second line treatment. If SE persists, anesthetic drugs are probably the best option for third line treatment, despite lack of evidence. Midazolam is usually the best initial choice and barbiturates should be considered for refractory cases. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus has a similar initial approach, with benzodiazepines and second line intravenous (IV) agents, but after that, aggressiveness should be balanced considering risk of lesion due to seizures and medical complications caused by aggressive treatment. Usually, the best approach is the use of sequential IV antiepileptic drugs (oral/tube are options if IV options are not available). EEG monitoring is crucial for diagnosis of nonconvulsive SE, after initial control of convulsive SE and treatment control. Institutional protocols are advised to improve care.

Status epilepticus: review on diagnosis, monitoring and treatment / Estado de mal epiléptico: revisão sobre diagnóstico, monitorização e tratamento

Abstract Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. According to the new ILAE 2015 definition, SE results either from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or initiation, leading to abnormally prolonged seizures. The definition has different time points for convulsive, focal and absence SE. Time is brain. There are changes in synaptic receptors leading to a more proconvulsant state and increased risk of brain lesion and sequelae with long duration. Management of SE must include three pillars: stop seizures, stabilize patients to avoid secondary lesions and treat underlying causes. Convulsive SE is defined after 5 minutes and is a major emergency. Benzodiazepines are the initial treatment, and should be given fast and an adequate dose. Phenytoin/fosphenytoin, levetiracetam and valproic acid are evidence choices for second line treatment. If SE persists, anesthetic drugs are probably the best option for third line treatment, despite lack of evidence. Midazolam is usually the best initial choice and barbiturates should be considered for refractory cases. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus has a similar initial approach, with benzodiazepines and second line intravenous (IV) agents, but after that, aggressiveness should be balanced considering risk of lesion due to seizures and medical complications caused by aggressive treatment. Usually, the best approach is the use of sequential IV antiepileptic drugs (oral/tube are options if IV options are not available). EEG monitoring is crucial for diagnosis of nonconvulsive SE, after initial control of convulsive SE and treatment control. Institutional protocols are advised to improve care.

RESUMO O estado de mal epiléptico (EME) é uma emergência frequente, com alta morbi-mortalidade. Segundo nova definição da ILAE de 2015, EME acontece pela falha dos mecanismos responsáveis ​​pelo término ou início das crises, sendo anormalmente prolongadas. Pela definição existem diferentes tempos entre EME convulsivo, focal e ausência. Tempo é cérebro. Ocorrem alterações nos receptores sinápticos, levando estado mais pró-convulsivante, com aumento risco de lesão cerebral e sequelas. O manejo do EME deve incluir três pilares: parar a crise, estabilizar o paciente para evitar lesão secundária e tratar a etiologia. EME convulsivo é definido quando duração é maior que 5 minutos e trata-se grande emergência. Os benzodiazepínicos são o tratamento inicial, devem ser administrados rapidamente e na dose adequada. Fenitoína/fosfenitoína, levetiracetam e ácido valpróico são opções com evidência para tratamento de segunda linha. Se EME persistir, uso dos anestésicos é provavelmente a melhor opção como terceira linha tratamento, apesar da falta de evidências adequadas. O midazolam costuma ser a melhor escolha inicial e os barbitúricos devem ser considerados para casos refratários. O EME não convulsivo tem abordagem inicial semelhante, com benzodiazepínicos e agentes segunda linha, mas após, a agressividade deve ser equilibrada considerando risco de lesão pelas crises e complicações pelo tratamento agressivo. A abordagem sugerida é uso de fármacos IV sequenciais (via oral/tubo quando opções IV não disponíveis). A monitorização por EEG é fundamental para o diagnóstico do EME não convulsivo, após controle inicial EME convulsivo e para controle do tratamento. Protocolos institucionais são recomendados.

COVID-19 and epilepsy: How are people with epilepsy in Brazil?

PURPOSE: During COVID-19 pandemic the global population is facing an important psychosocial distress. The aim of this study was to evaluate how people with epilepsy (PWE) in Brazil is dealing with the pandemic, in relation to seizure frequency, access to antiseizure medicines (ASM), medical follow-up, and well-being. METHODS: An online questionnaire survey among PWE (group 1) and caregivers (group 2) was applied in the social networks of the Brazilian Association of Epilepsy, the official Brazilian chapter of the International Bureau for Epilepsy. The questionnaire was composed of 46 generic questions in four areas, namely, demographics and baseline clinical data as well as epilepsy and quality-of-life impact by COVID-19 pandemic based on the domains of the abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument. RESULTS: The questionnaire was answered by 464 participants including 380 (81.9%) PWE (78.7% female; age 34.3 yrs.; ±9.76) and 84 (18.1%) caregivers (patients' age 14.1 yrs.; ±10.30). During the COVID-19 pandemic, 36.8% of PWE and 36.4% of caregivers reported difficulties in accessing the epilepsy healthcare provider, and visits occurred normally only in 29.7% of PWE and in 34.5% of the caregivers group. Telehealth was not provided for 66.6% of group 1 and for 58.5% of group 2. Lack of availability of ASM was reported by 21.9% of PWE and 28.0% of caregivers in public dispensing units and by 19.2% and 17.8%, respectively, in private pharmacies. Increase in seizures during pandemic was mentioned by 26.3% and 27.9% of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patients who had increase in seizure frequency had more frequently reported problems with treatment and in quality-of-life concepts. Fear of having a more severe COVID-19 presentation because of epilepsy was reported by 74.5% of PWE and by 89.8% of caregivers. Dissatisfaction with current health status was reported by 36.7% and 38.1% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and that the support from others has decreased (56.1% and 66.1%, in groups 1 and 2) during the pandemic. The factors with higher Odds Ratio of increase in seizure frequency during pandemic were age >41 yrs., treatment in public healthcare system, drug-resistant epilepsy, adversities in getting ASM in public dispensing units, difficulties with prescription renewals, current financial problems and belief that epilepsy or ASM are risk factors for contracting COVID-19. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, PWE and caregivers reported increase in seizures in one-fourth of the patients and several difficulties, namely problems in accessing the healthcare system including ASM dispensation, telehealth, and fear of having a more severe COVID-19 because of epilepsy. There were also physical, psychological, and social concerns which affected quality-of-life-related aspects in this population. These facts may increase treatment gap in epilepsy in Brazil as well in other developing countries.

Potential autoimmune encephalitis following yellow fever vaccination: A report of three cases.

Meningoencephalitis following yellow fever vaccination is considered a viral neuroinvasive disease. We describe three patients with typical autoimmune encephalitis syndromes that developed 1-27 days following yellow fever vaccination. Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate-r antibodies were identified in the CSF and serum of two patients and the other case was associated with anti-neurexin-3 antibodies. One case was confirmed as vaccine-associated neurotropic disease due to reactive CSF yellow fever IgM, which suggested an infectious-autoimmune overlap mechanism. Two aditional cases of Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate-r encephalitis were identified in the literature review. Antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of neurologic adverse events following yellow fever vaccination.

Cannabidiol in the Treatment of Epilepsy: A Focused Review of Evidence and Gaps.

Approximately one third of epilepsy patients do not become seizure free with antiseizure medications. This treatment gap motivates research for new therapeutic options, such as cannabidiol (CBD). CBD differs from other cannabis derivatives because of its consistent efficacy and lack of a psychoactive effect. CBD can be recommended as adjunctive therapy in patients with Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes. The most common adverse effects (AEs) are drowsiness, reduced appetite, diarrhea, and vomiting. Transaminase elevation is the most common AE that leads to CBD discontinuation. Coadministration with valproate may increase the risk of hepatotoxicity. The combination of CBD and clobazam may increase both the effectiveness and the risk of AEs associated with these drugs. The most striking gaps in knowledge are the efficacy and optimal dose of CBD for adults with focal epilepsies, the long-term safety of CBD use, and strategies to improve access to CBD for people living with epilepsy.

Immunization stress-related responses presenting as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures following HPV vaccination in Rio Branco, Brazil.

IMPORTANCE: The absence of a positive diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in immunization stress-related response (ISRR) clusters may have not only a direct impact on affected patients' health but may also reduce compliance to national vaccination programs. It is therefore crucial to develop efficient diagnostic tools and a feasible proposal for proper communication and treatment of ISRR. PURPOSE: To explore the psychogenic nature of patients' convulsive seizures in a suspected outbreak of an ISRR cluster following human papillomavirus vaccination in Rio Branco, Brazil. METHODS: Twelve patients with convulsive seizures were submitted to prolonged intensive video-electroencephalography monitoring, brain magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid diagnostic testing, laboratory subsidiary examinations, and complete neurological and psychiatric evaluations. RESULTS: Ten patients received the positive diagnosis of PNES, and two patients received the diagnosis of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. No biological association was found between the HPV vaccine and the clinical problems presented by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged VEEG monitoring can contribute significantly to the positive diagnosis of PNES in ISRR clusters and to avoid hesitancy to vaccinate.

Neurological consultations and diagnoses in a large, dedicated COVID-19 university hospital.

BACKGROUND: More than one-third of COVID-19 patients present neurological symptoms ranging from anosmia to stroke and encephalopathy. Furthermore, pre-existing neurological conditions may require special treatment and may be associated with worse outcomes. Notwithstanding, the role of neurologists in COVID-19 is probably underrecognized. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the reasons for requesting neurological consultations by internists and intensivists in a COVID-19-dedicated hospital. METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out at Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, a 900-bed COVID-19 dedicated center (including 300 intensive care unit beds). COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR in nasal swabs. All inpatient neurology consultations between March 23rd and May 23rd, 2020 were analyzed. Neurologists performed the neurological exam, assessed all available data to diagnose the neurological condition, and requested additional tests deemed necessary. Difficult diagnoses were established in consensus meetings. After diagnosis, neurologists were involved in the treatment. RESULTS: Neurological consultations were requested for 89 out of 1,208 (7.4%) inpatient COVID admissions during that period. Main neurological diagnoses included: encephalopathy (44.4%), stroke (16.7%), previous neurological diseases (9.0%), seizures (9.0%), neuromuscular disorders (5.6%), other acute brain lesions (3.4%), and other mild nonspecific symptoms (11.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Most neurological consultations in a COVID-19-dedicated hospital were requested for severe conditions that could have an impact on the outcome. First-line doctors should be able to recognize neurological symptoms; neurologists are important members of the medical team in COVID-19 hospital care.

Neurological consultations and diagnoses in a large, dedicated COVID-19 university hospital / Consultas neurológicas e diagnósticos em um grande hospital universitário dedicado a COVID-19

ABSTRACT Background: More than one-third of COVID-19 patients present neurological symptoms ranging from anosmia to stroke and encephalopathy. Furthermore, pre-existing neurological conditions may require special treatment and may be associated with worse outcomes. Notwithstanding, the role of neurologists in COVID-19 is probably underrecognized. Objective: The aim of this study was to report the reasons for requesting neurological consultations by internists and intensivists in a COVID-19-dedicated hospital. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out at Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, a 900-bed COVID-19 dedicated center (including 300 intensive care unit beds). COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR in nasal swabs. All inpatient neurology consultations between March 23rd and May 23rd, 2020 were analyzed. Neurologists performed the neurological exam, assessed all available data to diagnose the neurological condition, and requested additional tests deemed necessary. Difficult diagnoses were established in consensus meetings. After diagnosis, neurologists were involved in the treatment. Results: Neurological consultations were requested for 89 out of 1,208 (7.4%) inpatient COVID admissions during that period. Main neurological diagnoses included: encephalopathy (44.4%), stroke (16.7%), previous neurological diseases (9.0%), seizures (9.0%), neuromuscular disorders (5.6%), other acute brain lesions (3.4%), and other mild nonspecific symptoms (11.2%). Conclusions: Most neurological consultations in a COVID-19-dedicated hospital were requested for severe conditions that could have an impact on the outcome. First-line doctors should be able to recognize neurological symptoms; neurologists are important members of the medical team in COVID-19 hospital care.

RESUMO Introdução: Mais de um terço dos pacientes com COVID-19 apresentam sintomas neurológicos que variam de anosmia a AVC e encefalopatia. Além disso, doenças neurológicas prévias podem exigir tratamento especial e estar associadas a piores desfechos. Não obstante, o papel dos neurologistas na COVID-19 é provavelmente pouco reconhecido. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar os motivos para solicitar consultas neurológicas por clínicos e intensivistas em um hospital dedicado à COVID-19. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo realizado no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil, um centro dedicado à COVID-19 com 900 leitos (incluindo 300 leitos para unidades de terapia intensiva). O diagnóstico de COVID-19 foi confirmado por SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR em swabs nasais. Todas as interconsultas de neurologia hospitalar entre 23 de março e 23 de maio de 2020 foram analisadas. Os neurologistas realizaram o exame neurológico, avaliaram todos os dados disponíveis para diagnosticar a patologia neurológica e solicitaram exames adicionais conforme necessidade. Diagnósticos difíceis foram estabelecidos em reuniões de consenso. Após o diagnóstico, os neurologistas participaram da condução dos casos. Resultados: Foram solicitadas consultas neurológicas para 89 de 1.208 (7,4%) em pacientes internados por COVID-19 durante o período. Os principais diagnósticos neurológicos incluíram: encefalopatia (44,4%), acidente vascular cerebral (16,7%), doenças neurológicas prévias (9,0%), crises epilépticas (9,0%), transtornos neuromusculares (5,6%), outras lesões encefálicas agudas (3,4%) e outros sintomas leves inespecíficos (11,2%). Conclusões: A maioria das consultas neurológicas em um hospital dedicado à COVID-19 foi solicitada para condições graves que poderiam afetar o desfecho clínico. Os médicos na linha de frente devem ser capazes de reconhecer sintomas neurológicos. Os neurologistas são membros importantes da equipe médica no atendimento hospitalar à COVID-19.

Neurological consultations and diagnoses in a large, dedicated COVID-19 university hospital / Consultas neurológicas e diagnósticos em um grande hospital universitário dedicado a COVID-19

Background: More than one-third of COVID-19 patients present neurological symptomsranging from anosmia to stroke and encephalopathy. Furthermore, pre-existingneurological conditions may require special treatment and may be associated with worseoutcomes. Notwithstanding, the role of neurologists in COVID-19 is probablyunderrecognized. Objective: The aim of this study was to report the reasons forrequesting neurological consultations by internists and intensivists in a COVID-19-dedicated hospital. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out at Hospital dasClínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, a 900-bedCOVID-19 dedicated center (including 300 intensive care unit beds). COVID-19 diagnosiswas confirmed by SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR in nasal swabs. All inpatient neurologyconsultations between March 23rd and May 23rd, 2020 were analyzed. Neurologistsperformed the neurological exam, assessed all available data to diagnose theneurological condition, and requested additional tests deemed necessary. Difficultdiagnoses were established in consensus meetings. After diagnosis, neurologists wereinvolved in the treatment. Results: Neurological consultations were requested for 89 outof 1,208 (7.4%) inpatient COVID admissions during that period. Main neurologicaldiagnoses included: encephalopathy (44.4%), stroke (16.7%), previous neurologicaldiseases (9.0%), seizures (9.0%), neuromuscular disorders (5.6%), other acute brainlesions (3.4%), and other mild nonspecific symptoms (11.2%). Conclusions: Mostneurological consultations in a COVID-19-dedicated hospital were requested for severeconditions that could have an impact on the outcome. First-line doctors should be able torecognize neurological symptoms; neurologists are important members of the medicalteam in COVID-19 hospital care.

Introdução: Mais de um terço dos pacientes com COVID-19 apresentam sintomasneurológicos que variam de anosmia a AVC e encefalopatia. Além disso, doençasneurológicas prévias podem exigir tratamento especial e estar associadas a pioresdesfechos. Não obstante, o papel dos neurologistas na COVID-19 é provavelmentepouco reconhecido. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar os motivos para solicitarconsultas neurológicas por clínicos e intensivistas em um hospital dedicado à COVID-19. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo realizado no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade deMedicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil, um centro dedicado à COVID-19 com900 leitos (incluindo 300 leitos para unidades de terapia intensiva). O diagnóstico deCOVID-19 foi confirmado por SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR em swabs nasais. Todas asinterconsultas de neurologia hospitalar entre 23 de março e 23 de maio de 2020 foramanalisadas. Os neurologistas realizaram o exame neurológico, avaliaram todos os dadosdisponíveis para diagnosticar a patologia neurológica e solicitaram exames adicionaisconforme necessidade. Diagnósticos difíceis foram estabelecidos em reuniões deconsenso. Após o diagnóstico, os neurologistas participaram da condução dos casos.Resultados: Foram solicitadas consultas neurológicas para 89 de 1.208 (7,4%) empacientes internados por COVID-19 durante o período. Os principais diagnósticosneurológicos incluíram: encefalopatia (44,4%), acidente vascular cerebral (16,7%),doenças neurológicas prévias (9,0%), crises epilépticas (9,0%), transtornosneuromusculares (5,6%), outras lesões encefálicas agudas (3,4%) e outros sintomasleves inespecíficos (11,2%). Conclusões: A maioria das consultas neurológicas em umhospital dedicado à COVID-19 foi solicitada para condições graves que poderiam afetaro desfecho clínico. Os médicos na linha de frente devem ser capazes de reconhecersintomas neurológicos. Os neurologistas são membros importantes da equipe médica noatendimento hospitalar à COVID-19.

The importance of recognizing faciobrachial dystonic seizures in rapidly progressive dementias / A importância do reconhecimento das crises distônicas faciobraquiais nas demências rapidamente progressivas

ABSTRACT Background: Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) is the prototypical cause of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD). Nonetheless, efforts to exclude reversible causes of RPD that mimic prion disease are imperative. The recent expanding characterization of neurological syndromes associated with antibodies directed against neuronal cell surface or sympathic antigens, namely autoimmune encephalitis is shifting paradigms in neurology. Such antigens are well known proteins and receptors involved in synaptic transmission. Their dysfunction results in neuropsychiatric symptoms, psychosis, seizures, movement disorders and RPD. Faciobrachial dystonic seizure (FBDS) is a novel characterized type of seizure, specific for anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Objective: In order to improve clinical recognition we report the cases of two Brazilian patients who presented with characteristic FDBS (illustrated by videos) and anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Methods: We have included all patients with FBDS and confirmed anti-LGI1 encephalitis and video records of FDBS in two tertiary Brazilian centers: Department of Neurology of Hospital das Clínicas, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil and Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015. Results: Both patients presented with clinical features of limbic encephalitis associated with FBDS, hyponatremia and normal CSF. None of them presented with tumor and both showed a good response after immunotherapy. Conclusion: FBDSs may be confounded with myoclonus and occurs simultaneously with rapid cognitive decline. Unawareness of FDBS may induce to misdiagnosing a treatable cause of RPD as CJD.

RESUMO Embasamento: A doença de Creutzfeldt-Jakob (DCJ) é o protótipo de demência rapidamente progressiva (DRP). No entanto, é imperativo que sejam excluídas causas reversíveis de DRPs que possam simular doença priônica. A recente caracterização de síndromes neurológicas associadas a anticorpos direcionados contra antígenos de superfície neuronal ou sinapse, assim denominadas de encefalites autoimunes, está mudando paradigmas em neurologia. Esses antígenos estão envolvidos na transmissão sináptica, sendo que as disfunções destes podem resultar em sintomas neuropsiquiátricos, psicose, crises epilépticas, distúrbios do movimento e DRP. A crise distônica faciobraquial (CDFB) é um tipo de crise recentemente caracterizada e específica da encefalite anti-LGI1. Objetivo: Para promover um melhor reconhecimento da doença relatamos os casos de 2 pacientes brasileiros que apresentaram CDFBs (ilustradas com vídeos) associadas à encefalite anti-LGI1. Métodos: Foram incluídos todos os pacientes com CDFBs e encefalite anti-LGI1 confirmados em 2 centros brasileiros terciários: Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil e o Hospital Geral de Fortaleza entre 01 de janeiro de 2011 e 31 de dezembro de 2015. Resultados: Ambos os casos apresentaram quadro clinico típico de encefalite límbica associada a CDFBs e exame do LCR sem alterações. Nenhum caso associou-se à presença de neoplasia e ambos apresentaram boa resposta à imunoterapia. Conclusão: A CDFB podem ser confundidas com mioclonias e ocorrer simultaneamente com rápido declínio cognitivo, o seu não reconhecimento pode induzir ao diagnóstico errôneo de uma causa potencialmente tratável de DRP como sendo DCJ.

The importance of recognizing faciobrachial dystonic seizures in rapidly progressive dementias.

BACKGROUND: Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) is the prototypical cause of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD). Nonetheless, efforts to exclude reversible causes of RPD that mimic prion disease are imperative. The recent expanding characterization of neurological syndromes associated with antibodies directed against neuronal cell surface or sympathic antigens, namely autoimmune encephalitis is shifting paradigms in neurology. Such antigens are well known proteins and receptors involved in synaptic transmission. Their dysfunction results in neuropsychiatric symptoms, psychosis, seizures, movement disorders and RPD. Faciobrachial dystonic seizure (FBDS) is a novel characterized type of seizure, specific for anti-LGI1 encephalitis. OBJECTIVE: In order to improve clinical recognition we report the cases of two Brazilian patients who presented with characteristic FDBS (illustrated by videos) and anti-LGI1 encephalitis. METHODS: We have included all patients with FBDS and confirmed anti-LGI1 encephalitis and video records of FDBS in two tertiary Brazilian centers: Department of Neurology of Hospital das Clínicas, Sao Paulo University, Sao Paulo, Brazil and Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Both patients presented with clinical features of limbic encephalitis associated with FBDS, hyponatremia and normal CSF. None of them presented with tumor and both showed a good response after immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: FBDSs may be confounded with myoclonus and occurs simultaneously with rapid cognitive decline. Unawareness of FDBS may induce to misdiagnosing a treatable cause of RPD as CJD.

EMBASAMENTO: A doença de Creutzfeldt-Jakob (DCJ) é o protótipo de demência rapidamente progressiva (DRP). No entanto, é imperativo que sejam excluídas causas reversíveis de DRPs que possam simular doença priônica. A recente caracterização de síndromes neurológicas associadas a anticorpos direcionados contra antígenos de superfície neuronal ou sinapse, assim denominadas de encefalites autoimunes, está mudando paradigmas em neurologia. Esses antígenos estão envolvidos na transmissão sináptica, sendo que as disfunções destes podem resultar em sintomas neuropsiquiátricos, psicose, crises epilépticas, distúrbios do movimento e DRP. A crise distônica faciobraquial (CDFB) é um tipo de crise recentemente caracterizada e específica da encefalite anti-LGI1. OBJETIVO: Para promover um melhor reconhecimento da doença relatamos os casos de 2 pacientes brasileiros que apresentaram CDFBs (ilustradas com vídeos) associadas à encefalite anti-LGI1. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos todos os pacientes com CDFBs e encefalite anti-LGI1 confirmados em 2 centros brasileiros terciários: Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil e o Hospital Geral de Fortaleza entre 01 de janeiro de 2011 e 31 de dezembro de 2015. RESULTADOS: Ambos os casos apresentaram quadro clinico típico de encefalite límbica associada a CDFBs e exame do LCR sem alterações. Nenhum caso associou-se à presença de neoplasia e ambos apresentaram boa resposta à imunoterapia. CONCLUSÃO: A CDFB podem ser confundidas com mioclonias e ocorrer simultaneamente com rápido declínio cognitivo, o seu não reconhecimento pode induzir ao diagnóstico errôneo de uma causa potencialmente tratável de DRP como sendo DCJ.

A successful case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis without tumor treated with a prolonged regimen of plasmapheresis / Um caso bem-sucedido de encefalite por anti-receptor de NMDAR sem tumor tratado com um regime prolongado de plasmaférese

Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is a severe but treatable autoimmune disease of the CNS. However, the use of immunotherapy and long-term outcomes have yet to be defined for this disease. We describe a case of an 18-year-old male diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis not associated with tumor, which did not respond to initial treatment with immunoglobulin, followed by corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and evolved with significant clinical improvement after a prolonged course of plasmapheresis. Although it is not possible to affirm the good outcome was due solely to the prolonged plasmapheresis regimen, recently published data shows that improvement may take weeks or months to occur. This case discloses another therapeutic possibility for patients with refractory disease who fail to respond to recommended first-line and second-line therapy.

A encefalite antirreceptor de NMDA é uma grave doença autoimune do sistema nervoso central, mas responsiva a tratamento. No entanto o uso da imunoterapia e o prognóstico a longo prazo ainda não foram estabelecidos para esta doença. Aqui nós descrevemos o caso de um homem de 18 anos de idade diagnosticado com encefalite antirreceptor de NMDA, não associada a tumor, o qual provavelmente não respondeu à terapia inicial com corticosteroides, ciclofosfamida e, o qual evoluiu com melhora clínica importante após um curso prolongado de plasmaférese. Embora não seja possível atribuir o desfecho favorável apenas ao regime de plasmaférese prolongado, uma vez que publicações recentes demonstram que a resposta à imunoterapia pode levar semanas à meses, nosso caso abre uma possibilidade terapêutica nova para casos com doença refratária, não responsivos ao tratamento de primeira e segunda-linha preconizados